I'm looking for a new spotter to replace my sub par aging one. I was going to get the Nikon Prostaff 5 20-60X82 but have been hearing good things about the Diamondback. They seem pretty comparable and the Vortex is about $100 less. They both offer stellar warrants. Anybody have one or used one and would like offer your opinions? Thanks.
-
"Freedom is never more than one generation away from extinction" R.R. -
Anybody?"Freedom is never more than one generation away from extinction" R.R. -
I was impressed with the pocket-sized 9=27-56 by LUCID I know its less magnification than the ones you mentioned, but I don't know what your needs are.
we were using it out to 1760yd and it's sharp and clear. and I was using the vortex the same day, which I wasn't so impressed with, I was having a tough time getting it to focus, and the exit pupil was hard for me to find.Comment
-
Anybody here. Looking at some of the reviews the scope loses clarity at higher magnification. Not good. I use a Leupold SX-1 Ventana scope and shoot 200 yards at Big Sandy out in Calverton.Easy to see .22 holes at that distance. .308 holes appear pretty big on the Leupold. And no clarity loss at the highest magnification.
Its the 15-45 x60mm model.Runs about 250 or so. In doing research for spotting scopes the focus and clarity is more important than magnification.
I think they have a 20-60x60mm version thats more money but something to look into. I know this is not what you asked about but it's my recommendation. Also have a look at Sinclairs scope mounting base that clamps onto the bench and provides a rock solid mount even in higher winds at the range. Tripods wiggle all over the place and you can't see anything until the wind stops. The Sinclair is pricey, about 170 but it's worth it for the performance.
HTH'sLast edited by M14Shooter; 08-20-2016, 11:39 AM.Comment
Comment