Picked up my first revolver today, a s&w 686+, 4" barrel. I was looking at ammo, and the prices are pretty close for 38 spl and 357 mag. Price not being a factor, is one better than the other for target shooting.
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
opinions on 357 mag vs 38 spl ammo
Collapse
X
-
Exactly what Huntington Guy said. I would also add that the .38 will foul your cylinders faster because they are shorter than the .357. It shows up a bit more on the 686 vs. the 586. They make some good treated cloths (Birchwood Casey) to remove the fouling. They work great.Last edited by bberetta1; 07-08-2016, 08:25 PM.
- Likes 2
Comment
-
As it's your first revolver you're gonna want to get good with the looong trigger pull, sighting and grip of the .38 before you add recoil management of the .357. The "hottest" thing(in a gun way) I've seen as of late was a really petite, pretty, young lady whose back-up was a an Airweight .357. She got some gentle "are you serious" and "a little thang like you?" looks when she signed into the class. But she was really good with it.When they kick out your front door
How you gonna come?
With your hands on your head
Or on the trigger of your gun?
Comment
-
somewhat off topic, but
.30 Carbine vs .357 MagnumThere have been discussions in the past about the comparison between the .357 Magnum and the .30 Carbine cartridges. The comparisons have all included .357 magnum pistol velocities though. Well I did some research and got the ballistics for commercial .357 Magnum ammunition fired from a rifle.
The results are:
. 357 Magnum Rifle M.V. 1830 fps 100 yds 1427 fps 200 yds 1138 fps
158 gr. soft point M.E. 1175 fp 715 fp 458 fp
.30 Carbine M.V. 1990 fps 1567 fps 1236 fps
110 Gr soft point M.E. 967 fp 600 fp 373 fp
The .30 Cal carbine does have a noticibly flatter trajectory, but not enough to make a huge difference until you pass 200 yards
In other words the two cartridges are more or less equivalent.
I only rarely shoot .357 out of my Ruger GP100. When I do its astounding the difference in recoil and noise to the usual .38s I shoot. Now if the above comparison is accurate, and I think it is, there are many Marines from WW2 that said the only use for the M1 Carbine was burning its stock for firewood as the enemy (being P.C.) would not go down consistently compared with a hit from a Garand. Reminds me of the Vietnam and current arguments of 7.62 vs. 5.56.
Back on topic, I always clean my firearms same evening after shooting, and even two boxes of reloaded .38s don't really dirty up my Ruger all that bad.
Comment
-
I think once you start looking around you will find 38 is def cheaper than 357, but there is the cool factor of a hot 357 near dusk, and good choice on the 686 i have 2, wheel guns can get addictingLast edited by gripper 2.0; 07-14-2016, 04:37 PM.
Comment
-
Originally posted by bberetta1 View PostExactly what Huntington Guy said. I would also add that the .38 will foul your cylinders faster because they are shorter than the .357. It shows up a bit more on the 686 vs. the 586. They make some good treated cloths (Birchwood Casey) to remove the fouling. They work great.
I only use the cloth on my stainless handguns.
- Likes 2
Comment
-
Originally posted by gripper 2.0 View PostI think once you start looking around you will find 38 is def cheaper than 357, but there is the cool factor of a hot 357 near dusk, and good choice on the 686 i have 2, wheel guns can get addictingNRA Life member
Always looking for lead
Wheel weights. lino type, ect
PM me if you have or find some
Comment
Comment