So, someone mentioned these laws the other day and I haven't been able to stop thinking about it. 18 U.S.C.A 2384 and 18 U.S.C.A 2385. Federal laws against sedition (revolting or inciting revolt against the government) and advocating overthrow of the government by force, respectively.
Now, I am no lawyer, but it seems pretty clear to me, that both in the spirit, the intent and the literal interpretations of these laws are in direct conflict with the spirit, intent and the literal interpretations of the second amendment. Considering that the 2nd amendment was ratified in 1791, and these two laws were authored in 2000, aren't they ultimately invalid as they effectively undercut the constitution, which is referred to as "the supreme law of the land"?
Now, I am no lawyer, but it seems pretty clear to me, that both in the spirit, the intent and the literal interpretations of these laws are in direct conflict with the spirit, intent and the literal interpretations of the second amendment. Considering that the 2nd amendment was ratified in 1791, and these two laws were authored in 2000, aren't they ultimately invalid as they effectively undercut the constitution, which is referred to as "the supreme law of the land"?
Comment