Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Three reasons the U.S. hasn’t passed more gun regulations; and one reason now might be different.

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

    Three reasons the U.S. hasn’t passed more gun regulations; and one reason now might be different.

    Three reasons the U.S. hasn’t passed more gun regulations; and one reason now might be different.

    Eulalie Laschever, David S. Meyer 6 hrs ago

    As the pandemic recedes, mass shootings have again surged into the U.S. headlines. In response, President Biden used a bit of his first speech to Congress to call for federal gun safety regulation.
    © Elaine Thompson/AP Dozens of semiautomatic rifles line a pair of walls in a gun shop in 2017, in Lynnwood, Wash.

    Gun safety groups have been working to keep the issue alive. The House of Representatives already has passed a pair of bills to strengthen background checks for gun purchasers. Roughly 65 percent of Americans recently said they support modest increases in the nation’s gun regulations. Other democratic nations have passed tougher gun laws in response to mass shootings, with notable success in reducing gun deaths. New Zealand, which tightened its gun laws after a mass shooting in 2019, is only the most recent example.

    Our research tracked gun politics in the United States from 1945 to 2015. With that background, we do not expect Congress to pass new national legislation. Gun regulation advocates tend to mobilize after a high-profile shooting, after which the momentum dissipates. Their opponents in the gun rights movement, anchored by the National Rifle Association, remain strong and active without relying on media attention.

    Still, some facts suggest next time might be different.
    Gun rights groups have more money and staying power than gun regulation groups


    Well-organized groups fight on both sides of the gun debate, but their power is unequal. Our analysis of tax data shows that, as a whole, gun safety groups bring in, on average, less than 10 percent of the funding raised by gun rights groups.

    How the NRA 'politically weaponized' its membership

    Founded shortly after the Civil War, the NRA has long dominated gun politics. Since the mid-1970s, the group has burrowed into conservative politics, garnered massive financial support from both members and the firearms industry and cultivated a small but passionate constituency. While other gun rights groups come and go, the NRA has consistently accounted for about 90 percent of the movement’s publicity and the lion’s share of the movement’s resources, our analysis of New York Times coverage and 990 tax return data finds.

    Gun control groups, conversely, struggle to maintain consistent media attention, financial support and national influence. Groups with shared interests compete for resources. The most prominent gun safety group has accounted for about half of the movement’s visibility and funding, we find. The Brady Campaign to Prevent Gun Violence (formerly, Handgun Control Inc., and now just known as Brady), shared leadership with the National Coalition to Ban Handguns through the mid-1980s; with the Million Mom March and the Violence Policy Center for a few years after the 1999 Columbine High School shooting; with Mayors Against Illegal Guns (now Everytown for Gun Safety) since 2007, and with Moms Demand Action and Americans for Responsible Solutions (now Giffords) since the 2013 Sandy Hook Elementary School shooting. The emergence of March for Our Lives, founded by survivors of the 2018 Parkland High School shooting, is a recent example of how new groups become important to the gun safety movement every few years.

    We find the gun control movement is less steady than its political opponent. When enthusiasm wanes, groups reconfigure, merge, or disappear, and political leadership, messaging and organizational changes occur every few years.
    Most Americans support firearm restrictions, but few consider it an urgent priority


    While a majority of Americans support stricter firearms restrictions, few put such regulations at the top of their political concerns — except after a visible and dramatic tragedy. Gun safety groups must therefore link their efforts to current events. Since the 1960s, their agendas have shifted from stopping street crime, assassinations, and handguns to controlling semiautomatic weapons, enacting background checks and ending mass shootings, even though mass shootings represent only a small portion of gun deaths each year.

    The U.S. political agenda is crowded. To get attention, any advocate must link their issue to something at the top of the news. Moms Demand Action has added the George Floyd Justice in Policing Act to its action items. Brady is emphasizing how “gun violence is a racial justice issue,” and March for Our Lives has a new initiative with “BIPOC youth organizations and activists on the ground.” Such agenda expansion is common, both in this case and in organizing efforts more broadly.

    The NRA’s stable base of support, by contrast, allows it to choose when to engage with the public debate. After visible mass shootings — like the recent FedEx attack in Indianapolis or the Atlanta shooting of six Asian women and two others — the group typically goes silent, save to offer the much-mocked “thoughts and prayers” and castigate opponents for politicizing the moment. The NRA counts on momentary passions cooling before legislation can pass. Moreover, the group is organized around a simple and clear agenda: resisting restrictions on access to firearms. Organizing around “no” is easier than advancing any kind of affirmative agenda.

    Americans want police to release body-cam footage. But there's a bigger worry.U.S. political institutions favor the status quo


    U.S. political institutions were designed to slow or stop ambitious policy changes, making defense structurally easier than offense. Even with a sympathetic president and House, the Senate remains an obstacle, filibuster or not. The NRA still represents a critical faction of the Republican base, capable of threatening an incumbent with a serious primary challenge. A Supreme Court packed with Second Amendment expansionists could be a final backstop against new gun regulations.

    During the past half-century, institutional alignments favoring change have been exceedingly rare. In the United States, the smart bet is always against major policy changes.

    The Supreme Court just agreed to hear a Second Amendment case. That's bad news for gun regulation advocates.Why next time could be different


    Nevertheless, a few things are different now. A stream of high-profile shootings over the past decade has kept gun safety groups relevant and viable. With the support of committed billionaire Mike Bloomberg, Everytown for Gun Safety and Moms Demand Action depend somewhat less on the mood of the moment. In the 2018 midterms, Giffords and Everytown outspent the NRA in elections for the first time.

    More dramatically, the NRA faces its own institutional crisis. Leadership is battling internal dissent over management practices and public ridicule of Executive Director Wayne LaPierre’s lavish lifestyle. Contributions have faltered. Facing unprecedented financial stress, the NRA fired more than 200 staffers and declared bankruptcy. New York Attorney General Letitia James has filed suit to dissolve the group.

    The gun safety coalition is stronger than in the past, and the NRA is weaker. That could make a difference.
    Pat ------> NRA Endowment Member

    #2
    MSN.com.
    The go to source for libtard bullshit.
    I mean who wouldn’t;t believe what Eulalie Laschever has to say about guns.’
    After all she’s a sociology professor at some Kalifornia college and has researched such important topics such as “service sector’s implementation of HIV/AIDS prevention education programs in Southern India.”
    "Nothing in the world is more dangerous than sincere ignorance and conscientious stupidity." Martin Luther King, Jr.

    Comment


      #3
      Fundraising and funding sources can be 2 different things. Bloomberg, Giffords, Soros and others sponsor significant efforts as part of their normal SOP.
      That is not fundraising. To ignore the reality of the billionaire deep pockets committed to crushing gun rights would be a mistake.

      Historically, NRA was, while vilified by anti’s, was highly regarded in general. That has changed and their reputation is tarnished. They are still an effective entity but SAF, GOA etc are gaining considerably on the historic NRA leadership spot.

      American media has a well deserved legacy as a left leaning corps, but the extremism of the liberal positions dominating MSM today is not like the historical media norms...not by a country mile.

      Perhaps the greatest game changer AND influencer though is social media. The robot generations who have and are growing up on SM seem almost incapable of thinking independently and the narratives they are continuously fed are having their desired effect.

      When Facebook and Google can elect a President, defund our police, reign devastation on cities across America...they can certainly command the actions of Senate and Congress members...and they do.

      Back to fundraising: The dollar value of the billions of hours of content feed that SM controls can’t be quantified...and it is almost 100% directed at oppositional positioning on gun issues.
      Last edited by Huntington Guy; 05-07-2021, 03:24 PM.

      Comment


        #4
        The 'gun' issue is the only one that would coalesce the Right & potentially local law enforcement. So - the Left should tread carefully. Remember all those AR registration laws in the Northeast? What was the compliance rate?

        Comment


          #5
          Note that at the end of the article, the portion most people remember, they talk about problems within the NRA including bankruptcy.

          This whole drumbeat of internal strife within the NRA was all started by Bloomberg’s groups to CAUSE Internal strife in the NRA.

          And the fools in GD on ARF have fallen for it.

          Comment


            #6
            Originally posted by Augustus View Post
            The 'gun' issue is the only one that would coalesce the Right & potentially local law enforcement. So - the Left should tread carefully. Remember all those AR registration laws in the Northeast? What was the compliance rate?
            This is the only reason why the left has not gone full-bore on guns. (pun intended)

            Comment


              #7
              The left will simply never admit that they have become the establishment instead of the revolutionaries that they think they are. They dominate the government, the media, all of academia, entertainment, major corporations, even Wall Street, and yet they still believe they’re raging against the machine.

              Comment


                #8
                Originally posted by cold beverages View Post
                the left will simply never admit that they have become the establishment instead of the revolutionaries that they think they are. They dominate the government, the media, all of academia, entertainment, major corporations, even wall street, and yet they still believe they’re raging against the machine.
                power..total control..money..at whatever the cost..even if they destroy the country in the process

                Comment

                Working...
                X