As we head into this election...

[imrich]

With all the BS and mudslinging that will be ratcheting up as we head full steam into this election. I know it's hard sometimes to weed through the endless politispeak, But I remind you. Pay close attention to not only what IS being said, but more importantly, to what is NOT being said. Sometimes that'll tell you more about a candidate. I'm getting down off my soapbox now.

[spider]

The Clintons like to parse words.

[Huntington Guy]

With all the BS and mudslinging that will be ratcheting up as we head full steam into this election. I know it's hard sometimes to weed through the endless politispeak, But I remind you. Pay close attention to not only what IS being said, but more importantly, to what is NOT being said. Sometimes that'll tell you more about a candidate. I'm getting down off my soapbox now.

Huh? Did someone say Clinton Foundation?

[Barnslayer]

As far as I'm concerned, once the GOP chose their guy, the rest is distraction. It's either Trump or Hitlery. Is America better off than it was 8 years ago?
I find it hard to believe any American gun owner (or any American for that matter) needs more information before Election Day.

[Huntington Guy]

As SecState, abandoning an Ambassador and American Security Forces. Selling State secrets. Intentionally circumventing Intelligence security protocols. Manipulating financial markets.
These are, at minimum, felonious acts. More likely, IMHO, treasonous acts and crimes against the state.

not even touching Vince Foster, Whitewater and dozens of other things she/they have been AND CONTINUE TO BE A PART OF.

[LazyLab]

Yea thanks! My minds not made up yet.

[Grifhunter]

Supreme.....Court.......Nominations.........

Thats it. EVERY Democrat nominee, all leftist, urban law professors, have supported extreme socialist agendas, believes the 2nd Amendment is for militias only, and winks playfully at the executive branch working its way around the constitution. While MOST Republican nominees have been 2A supporters, sober, pro freedom jurists with allegiances only to the US Constitution.

My goofy pointer could be the Republican nominee and we'd be far better off than with Hillary. End of story.

[LiDad]

Judge Roberts was nominated by GWB, and that's turned out soooooo good for us.

[Grifhunter]

Judge Roberts was nominated by GWB, and that's turned out soooooo good for us.

Roberts was pro 2A on Heller and McDonald. I say thats pretty good. How many Dem nominees ever flipped and voted pro 2A. Lets count......NONE.
A Republican nominee not falling in line is an historical rarity. A Dem nominee is always leftist. Always.

[LiDad]

Roberts was pro 2A on Heller and McDonald. I say thats pretty good. How many Dem nominees ever flipped and voted pro 2A. Lets count......NONE.
A Republican nominee not falling in line is an historical rarity. A Dem nominee is always leftist. Always.

That may be.

But given how he's decided cases lately I wouldn't count on him if they ever came around again.

[Grifhunter]

That may be.

But given how he's decided cases lately I wouldn't count on him if they ever came around again.

So what? How does that relate to the point I made? Are you saying we shouldn't vote Republican because there is the rare chance the Republican president's nominee for the Supreme Court might vote with the libs? ?????

Roberts would never reverse himself on the Heller or McDonald issues. You're trying to use his votes on the Obamacare case to make him into a leftist jurist, and that is just simply a distortion of his overall voting record.

[LiDad]

So what? How does that relate to the point I made? Are you saying we shouldn't vote Republican because there is the rare chance the Republican president's nominee for the Supreme Court might vote with the libs? ?????

Of course not.

Roberts would never reverse himself on the Heller or McDonald issues. You're trying to use his votes on the Obamacare case to make him into a leftist jurist, and that is just simply a distortion of his overall voting record.

Really? Never?

Do you have that in stone from G*d?

And don't forget it was 2 Obamacare cases.

There was also something else recently, don't recall what, that he was expected to vote conservative but voted with the liberals.

[Grifhunter]

Of course not.



Really? Never?

Do you have that in stone from G*d?

And don't forget it was 2 Obamacare cases.

There was also something else recently, don't recall what, that he was expected to vote conservative but voted with the liberals.

Yes, God told me Roberts isn't going to reverse Heller, telling me Roberts already had the chance to do so in the later McDonald case and didn't.

If you want to paint Roberts as a liberal justice, try and find some commentary or academic article that agrees with you. Aberrational cases don't prove your point, a point I've yet to comprehend as to its relevance to the issue posed, namely, the need to vote for a Republican for president.

[LiDad]

Yes, God told me Roberts isn't going to reverse Heller, telling me Roberts already had the chance to do so in the later McDonald case and didn't.

If you want to paint Roberts as a liberal justice, try and find some commentary or academic article that agrees with you. Aberrational cases don't prove your point, a point I've yet to comprehend as to its relevance to the issue posed, namely, the need to vote for a Republican for president.

I don't know if he's liberal but he surely isn't as Conservative as you seem to want him to be.

Can you show me 3 cases where Justice Thomas or the late Justice Scalia sided with the liberals in a Constitutional case like Obamacare or Heller?

[LiDad]

Think about this:

Carter
Bush
Clinton
Clinton
Bush
Bush
Obama
Obama

And now potentially:

Clinton
Clinton


Who says there are no ruling class dynasties in America?